前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內(nèi)容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。

　　題目題材：失業(yè)，就業(yè)

　　gre argument 241題目：

　　The following appeared in a memo at the XYZ company.

　　When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating resums and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited greatly from Delanys services: last year those who used Delany found jobs much more quickly than did those who did not . Recently, it has been proposed that we use the less-expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany. This would be a mistake because eight years ago, when XYZ was using Walsh, only half of the workers we laid off at that time found jobs within a year . Moreover, Delany is clearly superior, as evidenced by its bigger staff and larger number of branch offices . After all, last year Delanys clients took an average of six months to find jobs, whereas Walshs clients took nine .

　　提綱：

　　The author unfairly attributes the successful employment result of the laid-off employees who used Delany to Delanys assistance.

　　The fact that only half of the laid-off workers found jobs within a year may not result from ineffectiveness of Walsh.

　　Many factors could explain the differences between the employment results of using each company.

　　Without any comparative data, we cannot determine if the employment result of workers who use Walsh eight years ago are poor.

　　Many conditions would have changed during the past eight years.

　　The size of staff and number of branch offices do not necessarily indicate the quality and effectiveness of a companys service.

　　A bigger staff may just indicate that the efficiency at Delany is lower.

　　There is no significant difference between finding job within six months and within nine months.

　　Without detailed description of jobs found by Delanys clients and Walshs clients respectively, and without more information about their clients, we cannot evaluate which company is more effective.

　　A single years placement statistics hardly suffices to draw any firm conclusions.

　　注：題目中括號里的數(shù)字表明這句話體現(xiàn)的是提綱中第幾號缺陷。

　　無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應(yīng)該養(yǎng)成寫提綱的習(xí)慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習(xí)可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據(jù)就是作文的邏輯性要強(qiáng)。

　　前段時間為gre考生匯總了gre issue寫作提綱思路和分析，希望對考生在攻破gre issue寫作上有所幫助。接下來的幾天我們將為gre考生整理gre argument部分的提綱內(nèi)容。希望通過我們的整理和匯總，讓gre考生真正能掌握gre寫作的精髓。

　　題目題材：失業(yè)，就業(yè)

　　gre argument 241題目：

　　The following appeared in a memo at the XYZ company.

　　When XYZ lays off employees, it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating resums and developing interviewing skills, if they so desire. Laid-off employees have benefited greatly from Delanys services: last year those who used Delany found jobs much more quickly than did those who did not . Recently, it has been proposed that we use the less-expensive Walsh Personnel Firm in place of Delany. This would be a mistake because eight years ago, when XYZ was using Walsh, only half of the workers we laid off at that time found jobs within a year . Moreover, Delany is clearly superior, as evidenced by its bigger staff and larger number of branch offices . After all, last year Delanys clients took an average of six months to find jobs, whereas Walshs clients took nine .

　　提綱：

　　The author unfairly attributes the successful employment result of the laid-off employees who used Delany to Delanys assistance.

　　The fact that only half of the laid-off workers found jobs within a year may not result from ineffectiveness of Walsh.

　　Many factors could explain the differences between the employment results of using each company.

　　Without any comparative data, we cannot determine if the employment result of workers who use Walsh eight years ago are poor.

　　Many conditions would have changed during the past eight years.

　　The size of staff and number of branch offices do not necessarily indicate the quality and effectiveness of a companys service.

　　A bigger staff may just indicate that the efficiency at Delany is lower.

　　There is no significant difference between finding job within six months and within nine months.

　　Without detailed description of jobs found by Delanys clients and Walshs clients respectively, and without more information about their clients, we cannot evaluate which company is more effective.

　　A single years placement statistics hardly suffices to draw any firm conclusions.

　　注：題目中括號里的數(shù)字表明這句話體現(xiàn)的是提綱中第幾號缺陷。

　　無論是gre issue還是gre argument，考生都應(yīng)該養(yǎng)成寫提綱的習(xí)慣。這種提綱式的gre寫作練習(xí)可以幫助考生鍛煉寫作的邏輯性，而gre寫作高分最重要的得分依據(jù)就是作文的邏輯性要強(qiáng)。