雅思閱讀回憶1
.h1 { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 22pt; MARGIN: 17pt 0cm 16.5pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 240%; TEXT-ALIGN: justify}.h2 { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 16pt; MARGIN: 13pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 173%; TEXT-ALIGN: justify}.h3 { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 16pt; MARGIN: 13pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 173%; TEXT-ALIGN: justify}
小幽靈
KILLER
幸福在哪里?
隨著生活變得富裕，人們有了更多的選擇，然而他們并沒有因此而變得更加快樂。有人做了個實驗，把實驗對象分成兩組，一組是每次都嘗試做best choice的(Maxmiser)，另一組是只要good enough就可以了，也就是Satisfier。M每次做決定以前，都要花很多時間在比較和選擇上，但是S只要看到自己喜歡的東西就買了。實驗證明貌似是M比S不快樂。選擇越多意味著機會成本越大，而人們對于失去感到的痛苦遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)大于因為得到而感到的快樂，這就是為什么人們反而更加不快樂的原因。
文章后面提到一個theatre ticket實驗。就是說買全票的人跟買折扣票的人相比，不去看戲的比率更小，原因在于the more people invest, the more they will feel regret if they dont use it.
文章的最后作者提議說M怎樣變得快樂起來呢?那就是在某些不重要的情況下，適當(dāng)縮小選擇的范圍，比如買衣服只要走兩家店就好了。
It would seem trying to be a maximiser in everything would lead to being a maximiser of nothing as it indicates a lack of priorities or a procrastinating perfectionist.
A satisfier in everything would also lack priorities or prioritize their personal time and happiness. A satifier in most things and maximiser of personal priorities would seem optimal.
.h1 { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 22pt; MARGIN: 17pt 0cm 16.5pt; LINE-HEIGHT: 240%; TEXT-ALIGN: justify}.h2 { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 16pt; MARGIN: 13pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 173%; TEXT-ALIGN: justify}.h3 { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; TEXT-JUSTIFY: inter-ideograph; FONT-SIZE: 16pt; MARGIN: 13pt 0cm; LINE-HEIGHT: 173%; TEXT-ALIGN: justify}
小幽靈
KILLER
幸福在哪里?
隨著生活變得富裕，人們有了更多的選擇，然而他們并沒有因此而變得更加快樂。有人做了個實驗，把實驗對象分成兩組，一組是每次都嘗試做best choice的(Maxmiser)，另一組是只要good enough就可以了，也就是Satisfier。M每次做決定以前，都要花很多時間在比較和選擇上，但是S只要看到自己喜歡的東西就買了。實驗證明貌似是M比S不快樂。選擇越多意味著機會成本越大，而人們對于失去感到的痛苦遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)大于因為得到而感到的快樂，這就是為什么人們反而更加不快樂的原因。
文章后面提到一個theatre ticket實驗。就是說買全票的人跟買折扣票的人相比，不去看戲的比率更小，原因在于the more people invest, the more they will feel regret if they dont use it.
文章的最后作者提議說M怎樣變得快樂起來呢?那就是在某些不重要的情況下，適當(dāng)縮小選擇的范圍，比如買衣服只要走兩家店就好了。
It would seem trying to be a maximiser in everything would lead to being a maximiser of nothing as it indicates a lack of priorities or a procrastinating perfectionist.
A satisfier in everything would also lack priorities or prioritize their personal time and happiness. A satifier in most things and maximiser of personal priorities would seem optimal.
