到現(xiàn)在一篇沒練的同學(xué)，至少練一下前四道。練過的同學(xué)，可以選擇自己沒練過的題型練練。各種題型都練過的同學(xué)，可以側(cè)重看看這些模擬題范文里的論據(jù)和關(guān)鍵的話題詞，也可以用默寫或?qū)ψg的方式來檢查自己的語言質(zhì)量。想要瞞天過海、僥幸過關(guān)的同學(xué)可以只背前四篇里面劃線的部分。

　　你要說押題押中的可能性有多大，我即使告訴你有百分之九十九也沒用，因?yàn)槟愫芸赡芩涝谀鞘Ｓ嗟陌俜种簧希前俜种豢赡苁窍袼募?jí)曾經(jīng)考過的事故見證書，導(dǎo)游詞，招新啟示，有個(gè)錘子模板可用？

　　所以，在背誦一些模板句墊底的基礎(chǔ)上，更應(yīng)該動(dòng)手練幾篇，找找寫作的手感，夯實(shí)一批自己喜歡用的好詞好句，暴露自己的常見詞匯和語法問題，然后通過自學(xué)庫和對(duì)照范文來改正。

　　寫作模擬題

　　（一）對(duì)立觀點(diǎn)型

　　Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition of at least 150 words but no more than 200 words according to the following information:

　　Currently, a number of schools allow students to grade their teachers and even decide if the teachers can teach on or not. This has given rise to a heated debate, with some approving of the pratice and others strongly opposed to it. Now discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　參考范文

　　（一）對(duì)立觀點(diǎn)型

　　1. Is It Up to Students to Evaluate Teachers?

　　The past few years have witnessed a mounting number ofuniversities allowing students to evaluate their teachers and even decide if they can stay on their positions or not. To this practice, peoples attitudes differ considerably. Some applaud it warmly whereas others criticize and even condemn it harshly.

　　Proponents of the practice may list the following reasons. In the first place, they assert thatstudents are the people who know the most clearly about the teaching performance of a teacher, so they should have the say in evaluating him or her. In the second place, they contend thatstudents have paid for their education, so they have the right to decide which teacher should be employed.

　　Opponents, however, point out that it is dangerous toleave the right to students to evaluate teachers. For one thing,students may not know what ought to be taught and how it should be taught; they may only judge a teacher according to his temper and even accent or appearance.For another,in order to please students, some teachers may resort to some improper means.

　　Personally, I believe that both views are justifiable, and we should achieve a balance between them by employingthe evaluating approach in a reasonable and beneficial way. To be specific,students should be allowed toevaluate their teachers, butthey may not be the only decision-maker in the teachers fate.

　　到現(xiàn)在一篇沒練的同學(xué)，至少練一下前四道。練過的同學(xué)，可以選擇自己沒練過的題型練練。各種題型都練過的同學(xué)，可以側(cè)重看看這些模擬題范文里的論據(jù)和關(guān)鍵的話題詞，也可以用默寫或?qū)ψg的方式來檢查自己的語言質(zhì)量。想要瞞天過海、僥幸過關(guān)的同學(xué)可以只背前四篇里面劃線的部分。

　　你要說押題押中的可能性有多大，我即使告訴你有百分之九十九也沒用，因?yàn)槟愫芸赡芩涝谀鞘Ｓ嗟陌俜种簧希前俜种豢赡苁窍袼募?jí)曾經(jīng)考過的事故見證書，導(dǎo)游詞，招新啟示，有個(gè)錘子模板可用？

　　所以，在背誦一些模板句墊底的基礎(chǔ)上，更應(yīng)該動(dòng)手練幾篇，找找寫作的手感，夯實(shí)一批自己喜歡用的好詞好句，暴露自己的常見詞匯和語法問題，然后通過自學(xué)庫和對(duì)照范文來改正。

　　寫作模擬題

　　（一）對(duì)立觀點(diǎn)型

　　Directions: For this part, you are allowed 30 minutes to write a composition of at least 150 words but no more than 200 words according to the following information:

　　Currently, a number of schools allow students to grade their teachers and even decide if the teachers can teach on or not. This has given rise to a heated debate, with some approving of the pratice and others strongly opposed to it. Now discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　參考范文

　　（一）對(duì)立觀點(diǎn)型

　　1. Is It Up to Students to Evaluate Teachers?

　　The past few years have witnessed a mounting number ofuniversities allowing students to evaluate their teachers and even decide if they can stay on their positions or not. To this practice, peoples attitudes differ considerably. Some applaud it warmly whereas others criticize and even condemn it harshly.

　　Proponents of the practice may list the following reasons. In the first place, they assert thatstudents are the people who know the most clearly about the teaching performance of a teacher, so they should have the say in evaluating him or her. In the second place, they contend thatstudents have paid for their education, so they have the right to decide which teacher should be employed.

　　Opponents, however, point out that it is dangerous toleave the right to students to evaluate teachers. For one thing,students may not know what ought to be taught and how it should be taught; they may only judge a teacher according to his temper and even accent or appearance.For another,in order to please students, some teachers may resort to some improper means.

　　Personally, I believe that both views are justifiable, and we should achieve a balance between them by employingthe evaluating approach in a reasonable and beneficial way. To be specific,students should be allowed toevaluate their teachers, butthey may not be the only decision-maker in the teachers fate.